Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:43

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Who are your 5 top Hollywood Silver Screen legends?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Salmonella outbreak linked to California egg distributor sickens 79 people - NPR
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Best Buy CEO raises red flag about startling customer behavior - TheStreet
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are your controversial and hot takes on Naruto?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
New Videos Show How Fantasy Life i Has Been Beefed Up On Switch 2 - Nintendo Life
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Tesla Stock Is Falling on a Downgrade. The Musk-Trump Feud Isn’t Helping. - Barron's
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
One of the Best Xbox Series X Games Is $56 Off Right Now - ComicBook.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.